Saturday, January 30, 2010
Monitoring Employee Use of Internet: Employer's Perspective
In line with this is the issue of privacy.
Privacy is the right of individual from public disclosure. It is the state where individual's life is away from publicity. A privilege where we can exercise to hide our embarassment, and to protect from intrusion of one's solitude. In the otherhand, there are some instances that the privacy of a certain individual should be unvieled in order to monitor malicious actions performed by the person that may somehow lead to any distruction or accident that can damage the life of others. In regards to the article stated above, business or organization has the right to check and monitor their employees' actions pertaining to business. It is the responsibility of the employer or top management to do these things. Since they're dealing with business matters, employees should act properly to maintain the reputation of being a good organization. It is an unethical manner for any employee to do things such as accessing pornographic or social networking sites, mailing to a friend or relatives for non-important matter electronically while there are more works to do, or chatting with foriegner during working hours with in the workplace. Thus, to avoid these events to happen, it is better for the organization to check their employees' Internet usage in order to be properly guided. Lastly, since employees are in the business, they should work purely for business.
Saturday, January 23, 2010
Activity 1 – Professional Organizations
Answer: The benefits in joining IT professional organizations are you will have the environment in practicing your expertise, gain a network of competent people in IT which help you in finding a job, and they make your IT skills and knowledge more credible and reliable to others.
What might be some disadvantages?
In your discussions mention at least three (3) local or regional, two (2) national, and five (5) international IT professional organizations including their brief profile.
Answer: The disadvantage would be your going to meet the high expectations of others since you're a member of a competent IT organization.
2. Should an IT Professional either be licensed or certified? Why or why not?
Answer: IT professional for me should be licensed or certiified. In this situation, like other professions such as Accounting, Teaching, or Nursing, IT should have a license in which this proves that the skills of a certain IT professional are reliable and had passed the standard requirements. It allows them to measure their skills and knowledge whether they are competent and capable enough.
3. As an IT graduating students of the College, what Certification or Licensing you are aiming for? Why?
Answer: As an IT graduating student, I am aiming for any certification that are recognized nationally, and internationally. Thus, these tranings, seminars, and workshop are very relevant for me in order to improve my skills, and further my knowledge in IT. Perhaps these certifications would be the proofs. Furthermore, I want to have a certification in Networking, Programming-Java, PHP, Javascript, Ajax, and others. Also, certification in Hardware and Software. It is my point of view that the more certificate you have possessed, the more competent and productive you are.
Friday, January 15, 2010
Philippine Law Provisions about Defemation
ACT NO. 3815
AN ACT REVISING THE PENAL CODE AND OTHER PENAL LAWS
(December 8, 1930)
BOOK TWO
CRIMES AND PENALTIES
Title Three
CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER
Chapter One
REBELLION, SEDITION AND DISLOYALTY
Art. 142. Inciting to sedition. — The penalty of prision correccional in its maximum period and a fine not exceeding 2,000 pesos shall be imposed upon any person who, without taking any direct part in the crime of sedition, should incite others to the accomplishment of any of the acts which constitute sedition, by means of speeches, proclamations, writings, emblems, cartoons, banners, or other representations tending to the same end, or upon any person or persons who shall utter seditious words or speeches, write, publish, or circulate scurrilous libels against the Government (of the United States or the Government of the Commonwealth) of the Philippines, or any of the duly constituted authorities thereof, or which tend to disturb or obstruct any lawful officer in executing the functions of his office, or which tend to instigate others to cabal and meet together for unlawful purposes, or which suggest or incite rebellious conspiracies or riots, or which lead or tend to stir up the people against the lawful authorities or to disturb the peace of the community, the safety and order of the Government, or who shall knowingly conceal such evil practices. (Reinstated by E.O. No. 187).
Art. 358. Slander (Oral Defamation)
I. Concept: It is understood as the speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood
II. Oral or verbal Defamation is of two kinds: (1) Grave when it is of a serious and insulting kind or (2) Simple
A. Factors to consider:
1. The expression used including their sense, grammatical significance and accepted ordinary meaning
2. The personal relations of the accused and the offended party, as when both are bitter enemies
3. The special circumstances of the case and its antecedents, such as the time, place and occasion of the utterances, persons present
4. The social standing and position of the offended party
B. Words uttered in the heat of anger or in a quarrel, with some provocation on the part of the victim, is simple slander.
Example: The refusal of the Mayor, without valid justification to approve the monetization of accrued leaves of the accused led the latter to utter scathing words against the Mayor, which utterances were considered slight as the said refusal was deemed sufficient provocation (Villanueva vs. People, April 10, 2006)
III. The victim may not have heard the words, it is enough that a third person heard them.
IV. Words uttered in one occasion and place and directed at several persons not mentioned individually constitute only one offense.
V. Words used as expletives ( i.e.to express anger, displeasure, are not defamatory)
1. Example: the words “Puta, Putang Ina Mo” are common enough expressions in the dialect that are often employed, not really to slander but rather to express anger or displeasure. It is seldom, if ever, taken in its literal sense by the hearer, that is, as a reflection on the virtues of the mother “(PP. vs. Reyes quoted in Villanueva vs. PP)
Art. 359. Slander By Deed.
I. The performance of any act which shall cast dishonor, discredit or contempt upon another person. Depending upon the seriousness of the act, the time, place, occasion, the character of the victim, it is either Grave or Light.
II. If it is not proven that the purpose of the act is to humiliate or embarrass the act may either be maltreatment or unjust vexation.
III. Poking a dirty finger ordinarily connotes the phrase “Fuck you” which is similar to the expression “Puta” or “Putang Ina Mo” and, when there is provocation from the victim, is simple slander by deed ( Viilanueva vs. Pp)
Tuesday, January 5, 2010
Reasons why there's no standard examination in IT
Answer:
In my own opinion, there is no standard examination for IT because this field is dynamic that it changes concurrently. Moreover, IT professionals have their own specialty or specialized skills in their respective field.
Considering myself as an IT professional after my graduation
Answer:
If I'm going t asses myself right now, Yes, I think I am already an IT professional. After all the researches, projects, discussions, examinations, and others that I had taken in my college years, I can say that I am already competent enough in an IT world. I had already taken my major field in IT, Web designing and programming, and practiced it seriously. In fact I have made my thesis project as a web-based, thus I had also done almost 4 web applications in my Special Project subject. Before I forget to mention, I am a PHP or Hypertext Preprocessor programming language specialist.
What is profession? professional? and their differences?
- the body of people in a learned occupation; "the news spread rapidly through the medical profession"; "they formed a community of scientists"
- an occupation requiring special education (especially in the liberal arts or sciences)
- an open avowal (true or false) of some belief or opinion; "a profession of disagreement"
- affirmation of acceptance of some religion or faith; "a profession of Christianity"
wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
- engaged in a profession or engaging in as a profession or means of livelihood; "the professional man or woman possesses distinctive qualifications ...
- a person engaged in one of the learned professions
- an athlete who plays for pay
- master: an authority qualified to teach apprentices
wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
In my own opinion, profession is the job description of a certain individual(s), the professionals. Thus, it is the career they had taken and the best work they had practiced. In contrary, Professionals are referred to us the people having the profession.
